Using a Patient Safety Analysis to Guide Infusion Therapy for Patients With COVID-19

In the United States, during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, patients with COVID-19 overwhelmed available intensive care beds, staffing levels were unpredictable, and personal protective equipment was limited. The safety of situating electronic infusion pumps outside patient rooms was evaluated using an internal risk assessment. Based on a low level of risk, a procedure was developed to direct clinicians as to when this process is appropriate during a national crisis. A standardized analysis, Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, was conducted to identify all potential risks and implement actions that would eliminate or control the risk. No adverse events were reported. Safe systems and preparation can protect patients.

Implementing daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing in VA settings: The human factors engineering to prevent resistant organisms (HERO) project.

BACKGROUND: Daily use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has been shown to reduce risk of healthcare-associated infections. We aimed to assess moving CHG bathing into routine practice using a human factors approach. We evaluated implementation in non-intensive care unit (ICU) settings in the Veterans Health Administration. METHODS: Our multiple case study approach included non-ICU units from 4 Veterans Health Administration settings. Guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety, we conducted focus groups and interviews to capture barriers and facilitators to daily CHG bathing. We measured compliance using observations and skin CHG concentrations. RESULTS: Barriers to daily CHG include time, concern of increasing antibiotic resistance, workflow and product concerns. Facilitators include engagement of champions and unit shared responsibility. We found shortfalls in patient education, hand hygiene and CHG use on tubes and drains. CHG skin concentration levels were highest among patients from spinal cord injury units. These units applied antiseptic using 2% CHG impregnated wipes vs 4% CHG solution/soap. DISCUSSION: Non-ICUs implementing CHG bathing must consider human factors and work system barriers to ensure uptake and sustained practice change. CONCLUSIONS: Well-planned rollouts and a unit culture promoting shared responsibility are key to compliance with daily CHG bathing. Successful implementation requires attention to staff education and measurement of compliance.